Leadership Perspectives
Leadership Perspectives: Navigating the Complex Landscape of Private and Public Ambulance Services
Chief Rickman
2/27/20264 min read


The article "Leadership Perspectives: Navigating the Complex Landscape of Private and Public Ambulance Services," originally published on PA TIMES Online on July 28, 2025, by Dereck W. Rickman, Tracy Rickman, Don Mason, and Ygnacio Flores, explores the leadership challenges and opportunities in emergency medical services (EMS).
Leadership in EMS: Bridging Private Innovation and Public Accountability in Ambulance Services
In the high-stakes world of emergency medical services, few decisions carry more weight than how communities organize and deliver ambulance care. To the average person dialing 911, an ambulance is an ambulance—lights flashing, sirens blaring, paramedics ready to save a life. But behind the scenes, the landscape is far more complex. Private ambulance providers and public services (often fire department-based) operate under different incentives, constraints, and priorities. Effective leadership means not choosing one over the other, but strategically blending their strengths to deliver equitable, efficient, and compassionate care.
As leaders in EMS—spanning military veterans, academic instructors, and public safety educators—we've seen firsthand how these systems intersect. Private services often excel in agility, technological adoption, and cost-control through market-driven models. Public services, meanwhile, prioritize accountability to taxpayers, community integration, and long-term stability amid political and budgetary pressures. The real challenge? Navigating this duality without compromising patient outcomes or public trust.
The Private Sector: Innovation Meets Regulatory Realities
Private ambulance companies thrive on efficiency and responsiveness. Free from some bureaucratic layers, they can rapidly deploy new technologies—like advanced dispatch algorithms, telemedicine integrations, or fleet optimization software—to improve response times and patient care. Profit motives drive innovation, but they also introduce pressures: balancing shareholder expectations with ethical care delivery, navigating reimbursement challenges from insurance and Medicare, and maintaining quality amid competitive bidding for municipal contracts.
Yet privatization isn't a panacea. Critics point to potential risks, such as cost-cutting that affects staffing or equipment, or service disparities in less profitable areas. Leaders in private EMS must champion transparency—openly sharing performance metrics, response data, and community impact—to build credibility. Ethical leadership here means prioritizing patient needs over pure profit, even when margins are tight.
The Public Sector: Accountability in a Political Landscape
Public ambulance services, increasingly managed by fire departments, face their own hurdles. Budgets depend on taxpayer dollars and local government approval, making advocacy a core leadership skill. Leaders must justify investments in training, vehicles, and technology while competing with other public priorities like policing or infrastructure.
A notable example is the transition in Fort Worth, Texas, where EMS operations shifted from the private provider MedStar to the Fort Worth Fire Department. This move highlighted the need for strategic planning: evaluating existing systems, identifying gaps (in response times, coverage equity, or integration with fire suppression), and implementing changes that align with community expectations. Such transitions require transparent communication with stakeholders—residents, unions, elected officials, and former private partners—to maintain trust and avoid service disruptions.
Public leaders also grapple with demographic shifts. With the Baby Boom generation (born through the early 1960s) now retiring en masse, demand for EMS is surging. Aging populations mean more chronic conditions, falls, and medical emergencies, stretching resources thin. Forward-thinking leaders advocate for scalable investments—better training in geriatric care, expanded community paramedicine programs, and partnerships that extend beyond traditional boundaries.
Community Engagement: The Common Ground
Whether private or public, the most successful EMS leaders treat community engagement as a strategic imperative. This goes beyond responding to calls; it involves participating in local health fairs, disaster preparedness drills, public education on CPR and stroke recognition, and forming partnerships with hospitals, schools, and nonprofits.
Engagement builds trust and yields insights. Communities reveal unmet needs—rural access gaps, language barriers, or underserved neighborhoods—allowing leaders to refine services. In public systems, this reinforces the role of EMS as a trusted community partner. In private models, it counters perceptions of profit-over-people, demonstrating commitment to equity.
Preparedness, Technology, and the Future
Leadership in EMS demands adaptability. Large-scale emergencies—natural disasters, mass casualty events, pandemics—test systems' resilience. Comprehensive response plans, regular drills, cross-training, and strategic partnerships (even between former rivals in public-private transitions) are essential.
Technology plays a pivotal role. Leaders should champion innovations that enhance outcomes without inflating costs unreasonably: GPS-enabled dispatch, electronic patient records, drone deliveries for remote areas, or AI-assisted triage. Public leaders, often budget-constrained, must make compelling cases for these investments by highlighting long-term savings and improved safety.
The goal isn't rigid adherence to one model but a hybrid approach that leverages the best of both worlds: private-sector speed and innovation paired with public-sector equity and accountability.
Final Thoughts: A Call for Collaborative Leadership
Ultimately, leadership in ambulance services transcends organizational charts. It's about integrating innovation with accountability, efficiency with empathy, and preparedness with flexibility. By fostering collaboration—across sectors, with communities, and among stakeholders—leaders can build EMS systems that are responsive, equitable, and sustainable.
Every decision shapes lives. In a field where seconds matter, the right leadership ensures that when someone calls for help, the response is not just fast, but fair, compassionate, and effective—for every community, every time.
About the Authors:
Dereck W. Rickman, MPA, is a Navy Veteran and GS-11 with the Federal Government. Dr. Tracy Rickman is an instructor at Tarleton State University. Don Mason, MA, and Dr. Ygnacio “Nash” Flores are professors at Rio Hondo College.
Authors: Dereck W. Rickman, Tracy Rickman, Don Mason, and Ygnacio Flores (matching the provided citation of Rickman, T., Rickman, D., Flores, Y. & Mason, D., with full first names clarified from the source).
Publication Date: July 28, 2025.
